A creative if inaccurate hypothesizing of how the human mind operates Particularly in the realm of language this author clearly lacks knowledge The inborn human grammatical instinct has been roven As anyone who has studied Computer Science knows linguistic logic reuires a ermanent grammatical reference residing in be it silicon or carbon based the brain His arguments often run counter to the Diari pop science of the age but Prinz is mostly right about important things in this book It s encouraging to see a careful and thoughtfulhilosopher successfully crafting a work like this for the inuisitive layperson If you care about human beings and our future you should hope this book is right Mr Prinz is a hilosopher and he believes that the nature nurture debate has swung too far towards nature in this era when molecular biology and neurobiology are ascendant This book was written to try and swing the balance back towards nurtureIf nature is a bigger factor then we are all stuck with what we were given at our conception But if Mr Prinz right and nurture is important then we all have Presented with a sort of antomime nature vs nurture rhetorical style that all but overwhelms the occasional good and thoughtful explorations of eg cross cultural differences in thinking A Long the Krommerun: Selected Papers from the Utrecht James Joyce Symposium patterns To be honest I found it interesting I wholeheartedly agree with theremise but rather repetitive and a tad dire Even the bit about language was just of the same and slightly
boring and I am a linguist I enjoyed the bit about gender though Good counter arguments to Steven and I am a linguist I enjoyed the bit about gender though Good counter arguments to Steven s Blank Slate Counter arguments Lancelot perhaps too strong Prinz doesn t deny human nature but claims it s controlling influence has been at times overstatedTightly organized well elucidated seems to cover all the ground but I m no expert Calls into uestion the interpretations results of many earlier studies making you realize that much care needs to be given to interpreting any study s results Gives us hope somewhat ie that we re not so completelyre determined A 1 on 1 debate between these two would be fascinatingmaybe there is one I ll check you tube later So you have Scorch perhaps heard of the nature vs nurture debate A while back Steven Pinker wrote The Blank Slate on the topic and early on he shared that severaleers had said to him some version of why bother with that topic everyone knows now that it is neither entirely nature nor nurture Pinker s response was that everyone says of course it s both but and then they come down on one side or the other I am simplifying of courseJesse Prinz who mentions Pinker s book in this one btw does something similar Yes of course our biological nature has an impact buthe thinks we re a blank nature has an impact buthe thinks we re a blank I m sure he would object to this characterization but he would Labour Markets, Identities, Controversies probably not object to being described as thinking that hiseers have gone way to far in ascribing to biology that which is adeuatel. A timely and uniuely compelling Marrane Et Marronne: La Co-Ecriture Reversible D Andre Et de Simone Schwarz-Bart plea for the importance of nurture in the ongoing nature nurture debateIn this era of genomerojects and brain scans it is all too easy to overestimate the role of biology in human This Deleuzian Century psychology But in thisassionate corrective to the idea that DNA is destiny Jesse Prinz focuses on the most extraordinary aspect of human Y explained by sociology Prinz thinks that the rincipal distinguishing trait of humans is their flexibility We can vary our diet our behavior our mating habits and many other attributes of fundamental biological importance and we can do this for no other reason than that we were raised that wayIf you were to ut it s all genes at one end of a spectrum and it s all learning at the other then Prinz is about 90% of the way to the right He does of course admit that there are biological limits to what we can and usually do but the list of what he thinks is culturallearned is long He does not seem to believe that I is very well explained by genetics and thinks instead it is almost entirely environmental He argues against the Chomskyan idea that our language abilities are a specialization and says instead that they are one aspect of a general statistical association ability of our brains He seems to believe the Sapir Whorf hypothesis what language we are most comfortable speaking in influences how we think He thinks emotions are not universal and hard wired but learned being substantially different in different cultures He is uite skeptical about the idea of instinctive non learned moral instincts He concludes with a chapter on sex and asserts that what we find
attractive age behavior even gender is shaped by the culture we are raised in the implication age behavior even gender is shaped by the culture we are raised in the implication that if anything should be hard wired it s our sex drive and if that is malleable then anything isBy and large I think he goes too far It may be that ideas about how much the ideal woman should weigh change with the culture but I have it on good authority that no amount of socialization can make a gay man not be attracted to other men The Enlightenment to Great War intellectual race between the English French and German speaking worlds did not seem to suggest that one s native language was much of a determining factor hence the Sapir Whorf hypothesis seems weak There may be lots of things that impact I some of them clearly environmental but the idea that our genes lay No Role Seems As role seems as as the claim that our muscular strength is unaffected by geneticsStill there is something useful to be gained in reading an argument taken to its logical conclusion and Sagwitch: Shoshone Chieftain, Mormon Elder, 1822-1887 perhaps slightly beyond If Prinz usually goes too far he is nonetheless able en route tooint out lots of flaws in widely shared thinking that goes the other way Prinz s book also gives lots of interesting insights and introduces us to many many intriguing experiments done by others he has clearly read widely and thought deeply about the topics he is writing about The best judge of a book on opular science is not how much one agrees with it but whether or not you are better informed after reading it and Prinz s books easily asses that test This book serves as a great introductory Le rendez-vous piece for anyone looking to get into the Nature vs Nurture debate The author. Ature that nurture can supplement and supplant nature allowing our minds to berofoundly influenced by experience and culture Drawing on cutting edge research in neuroscience sychology and anthropology Prinz shatters the myth of human uniformity and reveals how our differing cultures and life experiences make each of us uniue Along the way he shows .
Starts off with telling the story of what human nature was through the
of Hobbes and Hume and then launches into the endulum swing between the arguments for and against naturism and nurturism Where this book stands out at the beginning is when the author makes it clear that the argument is not a dichotomy and the arguments have now taken the form of throughgoing naturismnurturism which the Prinz very briefly defines with the help of examples The book is divided into several smaller areas covering ideas from language and learning to ideas of sexuality rationalismeyes of hobbes
And Empiricism While Tryingempiricism while trying keep a neutral stance by roviding alternate explanations to certain conjectures made by naturists for innnateness Prinz also uses a good amount of empirical studies erformed by well known researchers in their fields and introduces a lot of concepts simplified for a reader who is just looking to get into the debate I found many of the chapters insightful but there were times I did find myself wondering if Prinz was nitpicking at certain theories where some of the arguments have been updated and rectified and built upon My other All Our Trials: Prisons, Policing, and the Feminist Fight to End Violence problem with the book is when it cites a research butroceeds to use an example of the research not used in the original study The conclusions drawn from these might not be wrong but it did feel a bit straw man at some Discovering Our Past California Edition: Medieval And Early Modern Times points one major example being a study conducted by Leda Cosmides which the book wrongfully cites as Linda Cosmides and John Tooby about an innate logic mechanism to detect cheaters of social rules Overall the studies cited are very interesting but for any scholar looking to use this book as a reference material I strongly suggest that you do not cite this book word for word and look into the actualublished research In This Land: The Purple Book, Volume Four papers instead Despite that I think Prinz manages to construct a very compelling argument against naturism and I would recommend this book to anyone who does not have much background in socialcognitivesychology or hilosophy who intends on finding a lace to start Prinz s book is a meditation on the way our cultural environment shapes our development as individuals and as a species He takes exception to recent naturist research in the field and challenges many theories about innate characteristics I m guessing that if you re a naturist you ll The Houdini Solution: Put Creativity and Innovation to work by thinking inside the box probably like this book a whole lot less than I did but I found it gave me much to consider about the way in which humans learn and form societies Prinz is the antidote to contemporary analytichilosophy s agoraphobia He Cybercrime and Digital Forensics: An Introduction presents a unified empiricisticture of mind and language and morality
THAT MATCHES THE AMBITION OF HUME AND RUSSELL THOUGHmatches the ambition of Hume and Russell Though can t match the literary merit of the great empiricists he successfully carries out the roject set out in the subtitle of Hume s Treatise An Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects. Hat we can t blame mental illness or addiction on our genes and that societal factors shape gender differences in cognitive ability and sexual behavior A much needed contribution to the nature nurture debate Beyond Human Nature shows us that it is only through the lens of nurture that the spectrum of human diversity becomes fully and brilliantly visibl.